Sho Shimabukuro vs Charles Broom Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L L L L
Form
W L L L L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Shimabukuro 1 - 2 Broom
They have played 8 sets in total, with Shimabukuro winning 4 and Broom winning 4. The last match between Shimabukuro and Broom was at the Chicago Challenger, 22-07-2024, First, Hard with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sho Shimabukuro | 1 |
| Charles Broom | 2 |
Chicago Challenger(22-07-2024)
6
7
6
2
7
6
| Shimabukuro | Stats | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| 20% (2-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 188 | Ranking | 317 |
| 135 | Highest Rank | 235 |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 5 |
| 61% (242-155) | Career Total W/L | 61% (226-146) |
| $282,005 | Career Prize Money | $39,970 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shimabukuro VS Broom H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
55%
(
71 of
130)
1st Serve %
55%
(
66 of
119)
8
Aces
7
11
Double Faults
8
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
55 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
119)
129
Total Points Won
120
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
53%
(
76 of
143)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
61 of
143)
127
Total Points Won
119
|
||||
Shimabukuro VS Broom H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 42 | Games Won | 41 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:21:45 | Average Match Time | 2:21:45 |
| 56% (173/310) | 1st Serve % | 60% (167/278) |
| 66% (115/173) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (117/167) |
| 50% (68/137) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (51/111) |
| 34% (10/29) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (10/27) |
| 40% (110/278) | Return Points Win % | 41% (127/310) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
86 of
125)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
106)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
115
Total Points Won
116
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Antoine Escoffier
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
11
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
49 of
59)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Radu Albot
39%
(
19 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
12
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
11 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Edward Winter
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
7%
(
1 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jagger Leach
Player
Charles Broom
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Charles Broom
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
129)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
65 of
88)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
44 of
129)
116
Total Points Won
116
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Charles Broom
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
13
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 0-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Duda
Player
Charles Broom
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (242/155) | Win/Loss | 61% (226/146) |
| 58% (541/389) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (512/364) |
| 53% (4780/4181) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4443/3847) |
| 62% (180/111) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (96/58) |
| 61% (17/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (44/22) |
| 55% (32/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (61/47) |
| 65% (13/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (25/19) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1501 | Aces Total | 1572 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1067 | Total Double Faults | 926 |
| 1:31:6 | Average Match Time | 1:26:31 |
| 437.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 387.46 |
| 56% (14222/25343) | 1st Serve % | 62% (13177/21376) |
| 70% (10023/14222) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (9224/13177) |
| 51% (5715/11121) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4095/8198) |
| 44% (1103/2487) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (937/2303) |
| 40% (10125/25334) | Return Points Win % | 41% (9195/22609) |
| 56% (9/7) | Slam W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37% (7/12) | Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (84/67) | Challenger W/L | 44% (44/55) |
| 68% (139/65) | Futures W/L | 68% (180/84) |
| 61% (237/387) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (224/369) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 43% (64/150) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (58/117) |
| 56% (73/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (70/131) |
| 86% (237/205) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (218/187) |
| 13% (237/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (218/31) |
| 23% (160/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (154/39) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
